Theory of Computing Report

It is a long-standing open question whether the average-case hardness of NP implies the existence of a one-way function. The hypothetical world in which this does not hold is called Pessiland, which is the most pessimistic among Impagliazzo's five possible worlds. In this paper, we present the first "sharp" characterization of Pessiland: - NP is hard on average if and only if the minimum description length of programs in agnostic learning is hard to approximate on average with an approximation factor $\ell / \mathrm{polylog}(\ell)$, where $\ell$ is a new complexity measure of a distribution called advice complexity of sampling. - A one-way function does not exist if and only if the minimum description length of programs in agnostic learning is easy to approximate on average with an approximation factor $O(\ell)$. In particular, Pessiland is ruled out if and only if the small quantitative gap in approximation factors $\ell/\mathrm{polylog}(\ell)$ and $O(\ell)$ is closed. Our characterization is based on an optimal NP-hardness result for the Collective Minimum Monotone Satisfying Assignment (CMMSA) Problem, whose task is, given as input a collection of monotone formulas with at most $\ell$ literals, to compute the minimum weight of an assignment that satisfies as many monotone formulas as possible. We prove the NP-hardness of approximating the minimum weight within a factor of $\ell / \mathrm{polylog} \ell$, improving the previous inapproximability factor of $\ell^{\Omega(1)}$ by Hirahara (FOCS 2022). Our inapproximability factor is optimal up to the $\mathrm{polylog} \ell$ factor unless NP $\subseteq$ coAM because the CMMSA problem with an approximation factor $O(\ell)$ is in coAM.

The Department of Computer Science at Lund University invites applications for 1-2 PhD positions in theoretical computer science with focus on computational complexity and algorithms to be working in the research group of Susanna de Rezende. These are four-year full-time employed positions, but PhD positions usually include 20% teaching, in which case they are prolonged for one more year.

Website: https://derezende.github.io/openpositions/
Email: susanna.rezende@cs.lth.se

By shacharlovett

Authors: Petar Marković, Miklós Maróti, Ralph McKenzie, Aleksandar Prokić

We define a class of algebras, the semilattices of Mal'cev blocks (for short, SMB algebras). In a nutshell, these algebras are semilattices in which each element gets blown up into a Mal'cev algebra. We publish for the first time our old proofs that some SMB algebras induce tractable templates of the reprove that the Constraint Satisfaction Problem. Next, we reprove that, in fact, all SMB algebras induce tractable templates of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem, a result already proved by A. Bulatov. Also, we compare the two general proofs of the CSP Dichotomy and prove they are more similar than initially thought when they are applied to SMB algebras. This paper is the second in the series of papers investigating the SMB algebras and it is a precursor to our further research on the similarities between the proofs of the Dichotomy Theorem.

Authors: Michael T. M. Emmerich, Ksenia Pereverdieva, André H. Deutz

The Solow--Polasky diversity indicator (or magnitude) is a classical measure of diversity based on pairwise distances. It has applications in ecology, conservation planning, and, more recently, in algorithmic subset selection and diversity optimization. In this note, we investigate the computational complexity of selecting a subset of fixed cardinality from a finite set so as to maximize the Solow--Polasky diversity value. We prove that this problem is NP-hard in general metric spaces. The reduction is from the classical Independent Set problem and uses a simple metric construction containing only two non-zero distance values. Importantly, the hardness result holds for every fixed kernel parameter $θ_0>0$; equivalently, by rescaling the metric, one may fix the parameter to $1$ without loss of generality. A central point is that this is not a boilerplate reduction: because the Solow--Polasky objective is defined through matrix inversion, it is a nontrivial nonlinear function of the distances. Accordingly, the proof requires a dedicated strict-monotonicity argument for the specific family of distance matrices arising in the reduction; this strict monotonicity is established here for that family, but it is not assumed to hold in full generality. We also explain how the proof connects to continuity and monotonicity considerations for diversity indicators.

Authors: Thomas Depian, Carolina Haase, Martin Nöllenburg, André Schulz

A linkage $\mathcal{L}$ consists of a graph $G=(V,E)$ and an edge-length function $\ell$. Deciding whether $\mathcal{L}$ can be realized as a planar straight-line embedding in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with edge length $\ell(e)$ for all $e \in E$ is $\exists\mathbb{R}$-complete [Abel et al., JoCG'25], even if $\ell \equiv 1$, but a considerable part of $\mathcal{L}$ is rigid. In this paper, we study the computational complexity of the realization question for structurally simpler, less rigid linkages inside an open polygonal domain $P$, where the placement of some vertices may be specified in the input. We show XP-membership and W[1]-hardness with respect to the size of $G$, even if $\ell \equiv 1$ and no vertex positions are prescribed. Furthermore, we consider the case where $G$ is a path with prescribed start and end position and $\ell \equiv 1$. Despite the absence of any rigid components, we obtain NP-hardness in general, and provide a linear-time algorithm for arbitrary $\ell$ if $G$ has only three edges and $P$ is convex.

Authors: Gautam Chandrasekaran, Jason Gaitonde, Ankur Moitra, Arsen Vasilyan

In a landmark result, Linial, Mansour and Nisan (J. ACM 1993) gave a quasipolynomial-time algorithm for learning constant-depth circuits given labeled i.i.d. samples under the uniform distribution. Their work has had a deep and lasting legacy in computational learning theory, in particular introducing the $\textit{low-degree algorithm}$. However, an important critique of many results and techniques in the area is the reliance on product structure, which is unlikely to hold in realistic settings. Obtaining similar learning guarantees for more natural correlated distributions has been a longstanding challenge in the field. In particular, we give quasipolynomial-time algorithms for learning $\mathsf{AC}^0$ substantially beyond the product setting, when the inputs come from any graphical model with polynomial growth that exhibits strong spatial mixing. The main technical challenge is in giving a workaround to Fourier analysis, which we do by showing how new sampling algorithms allow us to transfer statements about low-degree polynomial approximation under the uniform setting to graphical models. Our approach is general enough to extend to other well-studied function classes, like monotone functions and halfspaces.

Authors: Jarosław Byrka, Yuhao Guo, Yang Hu, Shi Li, Chengzhang Wan, Zaixuan Wang

In this work we propose a single rounding algorithm for the fractional solutions of the standard LP relaxation for $k$-clustering. As a starting point, we obtain an iterative rounding $(\frac{3^p + 1}{2})$-Lagrangian Multiplier-Perserving (LMP) approximation for the $k$-clustering problem with the cost function being the $p$-th power of the distance. Such an algorithm outputs a random solution that opens $k$ facilities \emph{in expectation}, whose cost in expectation is at most $\frac{3^p + 1}{2}$ times the optimum cost. Thus, we recover the $2$-LMP approximation for $k$-median by Jain et al.~[JACM'03], which played a central role in deriving the current best $2$ approximation for $k$-median. Unlike the result of Jain et al., our algorithm is based on LP rounding, and it can be easily adapted to the $L_p^p$-cost setting. For the Euclidean $k$-means problem, the LMP factor we obtain is $\frac{11}{3}$, which is better than the $5$ approximation given by this framework for general metrics. Then, we show how to convert the LMP-approximation algorithms to a true-approximation, with only a $(1+\varepsilon)$ factor loss in the approximation ratio. We obtain a ($\frac{3^p + 1}{2}+\varepsilon$)-approximation algorithm for $k$-clustering with cost function being the $p$-th power of the distance, for $p \geq 1$. This reproduces the best known ($2+\varepsilon$)-approximation for $k$-median by Cohen-Addad et al. [STOC'25], and improves the approximation factor for metric $k$-means from 5.83 by Charikar at al. [FOCS'25] to $5+\varepsilon$ in our framework. Moreover, the same algorithm, but with a specialized analysis, attains ($4+\varepsilon$)-approximation for Euclidean $k$-means matching the recent result by Charikar et al. [STOC'26].

Authors: Mina Doosti, Ryan Sweke, Chirag Wadhwa

We introduce a framework for distributed quantum inference under communication constraints. In our model, $m$ distributed nodes each receive one copy of an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state $ρ$, before communicating via a constrained one-way communication channel with a central node, which aims to infer some property of $ρ$. This framework generalizes the classical distributed inference framework introduced by Acharya, Canonne, and Tyagi [COLT2019], by allowing quantum resources such as quantum communication and shared entanglement. Within this setting, we focus on the fundamental problem of quantum state certification: Given a complete description of some state $σ$, decide whether $ρ=σ$ or $\|ρ-σ\|_1\geq ε$. Additionally, we focus on the case of limited quantum communication between distributed nodes and the central node. We show that when each communication channel is limited to only $n_q\leq \log d$ qubits, then the sample complexity of distributed state certification is $\mathcal{O}(\frac{d^2}{2^{n_q}ε^2})$ when public randomness is available to all nodes. Moreover, under the assumption that the channels used by the distributed nodes are mixedness-preserving, we prove a matching lower bound. We further demonstrate that shared randomness is necessary to achieve the above complexity, by proving an $Ω(\frac{d^3}{4^{n_q} ε^2})$ lower bound in the private-coin setting under the same assumption as above. Our lower bounds leverage a recently introduced quantum analogue of the celebrated Ingster-Suslina method and generalize arguments from the classical setting. Together, our work provides the first characterization of distributed quantum state certification in the regime of limited quantum communication and establishes a general framework for distributed quantum inference with communication constraints.

Authors: Pasin Manurangsi, Krzysztof Sornat

We present a polynomial-time algorithm for computing an optimal committee of size $k$ under any given Thiele voting rule for elections on the Voter Interval domain (i.e., when voters can be ordered so that each candidate is approved by a consecutive voters). Our result extends to the Generalized Thiele rule, in which each voter has an individual weight (scoring) sequence. This resolves a 10-year-old open problem that was originally posed for Proportional Approval Voting and later extended to every Thiele rule (Elkind and Lackner, IJCAI 2015; Peters, AAAI 2018). Our main technical ingredient is a new structural result -- a concavity theorem for families of intervals. It shows that, given two solutions of different sizes, one can construct a solution of any intermediate size whose score is at least the corresponding linear interpolation of the two scores. As a consequence, on Voter Interval profiles, the optimal total Thiele score is a concave function of the committee size. We exploit this concavity within an optimization framework based on a Lagrangian relaxation of a natural integer linear program formulation, obtained by moving the cardinality constraint into the objective. On Voter Interval profiles, the resulting constraint matrix is totally unimodular, so it can be solved in polynomial time. Our main algorithm and its proof were obtained via human--AI collaboration. In particular, a slightly simplified version of the main structural theorem used by the algorithm was obtained in a single call to Gemini Deep Think.

Authors: Afrouz Jabal Ameli, Jesper Nederlof, Shengzhe Wang

We provide improved space-time tradeoffs for permutation problems over additively idempotent semi-rings. In particular, there is an algorithm for the Traveling Salesperson Problem that solves $N$-vertex instances using space $S$ and time $T$ where $S\cdot T \leq 3.7493^{N}$. This improves a previous work by Koivisto and Parviainen [SODA'10] where $S\cdot T \leq 3.9271^N$, and overcomes a barrier they identified, as their bound was shown to be optimal within their framework. To get our results, we introduce a new parameter of a set system that we call the chain efficiency. This relates the number of maximal chains contained in the set system with the cardinality of the system. We show that set systems of high efficiency imply efficient space-time tradeoffs for permutation problems, and give constructions of set systems with high chain efficiency, disproving a conjecture by Johnson, Leader and Russel [Comb. Probab. Comput.'15].

Authors: Justin Dallant, László Kozma

The traveling salesman problem (TSP) is a cornerstone of combinatorial optimization and has deeply influenced the development of algorithmic techniques in both exact and approximate settings. Yet, improving on the decades-old bounds for solving TSP exactly remains elusive: the dynamic program of Bellman, Held, and Karp from 1962 uses $2^{n+O(\log{n})}$ time and space, and the divide-and-conquer approach of Gurevich and Shelah from 1987 uses $4^{n + O(\log^2{n})}$ time and polynomial space. A straightforward combination of the two algorithms trades off $T^{n+o(n)}$ time and $S^{n+o(n)}$ space at various points of the curve $ST = 4$. An improvement to this tradeoff when $2 < T < 2\sqrt{2}$ was found by Koivisto and Parviainen (SODA 2010), yielding a minimum of $ST \approx 3.93$. Koivisto and Parviainen show their method to be optimal among a broad class of partial-order-based approaches, and to date, no improvement or alternative method has been found. In this paper we give a tradeoff that strictly improves all previous ones for all $2 < T < 4$, achieving a minimum of $ST < 3.572$. A key ingredient is the construction of sparse set systems (hypergraphs) that admit a large number of maximal chains. The existence of such objects is of independent interest in extremal combinatorics, likely to see further applications. Along the way we disprove a combinatorial conjecture of Johnson, Leader, and Russell from 2013, relating it with the optimality of the previous tradeoff schemes for TSP. Our techniques extend to a broad class of permutation problems over arbitrary semirings, yielding improved space-time tradeoffs in these settings as well.

Authors: Nader H. Bshouty, George Haddad

In this paper, we study classes of Boolean functions that are testable with $O(ψ+1/ε)$ queries, where $ψ$ depends on the parameters of the class (e.g., the number of terms, the number of relevant variables, etc.) but not on the total number of variables $n$. In particular, when $ε\le 1/ψ$, the query complexity is $O(1/ε)$, matching the known tight bound $Ω(1/ε)$. This result was previously known for classes of terms of size at most $k$ and exclusive OR functions of at most $k$ variables. In this paper, we extend this list to include the classes: $k$-junta, functions with Fourier degree at most $d$, $s$-sparse polynomials of degree at most $d$, and $s$-sparse polynomials. Additionally, we show that for any class $C$ of Boolean functions that depend on at most $k$ variables, if $C$ is properly exactly learnable, then it is testable with $O(1/ε)$ queries for $ε<1/ψ$, where $ψ$ depends on $k$ and independent of the total number of variables $n$.

Authors: Bernhard Haeupler, Anton Paramonov

We study and further develop powerful general-purpose schemes to maintain random assignments under adversarial dynamic changes. The goal is to maintain assignments that are (approximately) distributed similarly as a completely fresh resampling of all assignments after each change, while doing only a few resamples per change. This becomes particularly interesting and challenging when dynamics are controlled by an adaptive adversary. Our work builds on and further develops the proactive resampling technique [Bhattacharya, Saranurak, and Sukprasert ESA'22]. We identify a new ``temporal selection'' attack that adaptive adversaries can use to cause biases, even against proactive resampling. We propose a new ''temporal aggregation'' principle that algorithms should follow to counteract these biases, and present two powerful new resampling schemes based on this principle. We give various applications of our new methods. The main one in maintaining proper coloring of the graph under adaptive adversarial modifications: we maintain $O(Δ)$ coloring for general graphs with maximum degree $Δ$ and $O(\fracΔ{\ln Δ})$ coloring for triangle free graphs, both with sublinear in the number of vertices average work per modification. Other applications include efficiently maintaining random walks in dynamically changing graphs.

Authors: Florent Capelli, YooJung Choi, Stefan Mengel, Martín Muñoz, Guy Van den Broeck

We introduce Tree Decision Diagrams (TDD) as a model for Boolean functions that generalizes OBDD. They can be seen as a restriction of structured d-DNNF; that is, d-DNNF that respect a vtree $T$. We show that TDDs enjoy the same tractability properties as OBDD, such as model counting, enumeration, conditioning, and apply, and are more succinct. In particular, we show that CNF formulas of treewidth $k$ can be represented by TDDs of FPT size, which is known to be impossible for OBDD. We study the complexity of compiling CNF formulas into deterministic TDDs via bottom-up compilation and relate the complexity of this approach with the notion of factor width introduced by Bova and Szeider.

Authors: Dhanyamol Antony, L. Sunil Chandran, Dalu Jacob, R. B. Sandeep

Inversion of a directed graph $D$ with respect to a vertex subset $Y$ is the directed graph obtained from $D$ by reversing the direction of every arc whose endpoints both lie in $Y$. More generally, the inversion of $D$ with respect to a tuple $(Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_\ell)$ of vertex subsets is defined as the directed graph obtained by successively applying inversions with respect to $Y_1, Y_2, \ldots, Y_\ell$. Such a tuple is called a \emph{decycling family} of $D$ if the resulting graph is acyclic. In the \textsc{$k$-Inversion} problem, the input consists of a directed graph $D$ and an integer $k$, and the task is to decide whether $D$ admits a decycling family of size at most $k$. Alon et al.\ (SIAM J.\ Discrete Math., 2024) proved that the problem is NP-complete for every fixed value of $k$, thereby ruling out XP algorithms, and presented a fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm parameterized by $k$ for tournament inputs. In this paper, we generalize their algorithm to a broader variant of the problem on tournaments and subsequently use this result to obtain an FPT algorithm for \textsc{$k$-Inversion} when the underlying undirected graph of the input is a block graph. Furthermore, we obtain an algorithm for \textsc{$k$-Inversion} on general directed graphs with running time $2^{O(\mathrm{tw}(k + \mathrm{tw}))} \cdot n^{O(1)}$, where $\mathrm{tw}$ denotes the treewidth of the underlying graph.

Authors: Renan F. F. da Silva, Thiago A. de Queiroz, Rafael C. S. Schouery

The Knapsack Problem (KP) and its generalization, the Bounded Knapsack Problem (BKP), are classical NP-hard problems with numerous practical applications, and despite being introduced over 25 years ago, the solvers COMBO and BOUKNAP remain the state of the art due to their highly optimized implementations and sophisticated bounding techniques. In this work, we present RECORD (Refined Core-based Dynamic Programming), a new solver for both problems that builds upon key components of COMBO, including core- and state-based dynamic programming, weak upper bounds, and surrogate relaxation with cardinality constraints, while introducing novel strategies to overcome its limitations. In particular, we propose multiplicity reduction to limit the number of distinct item types, combined with on-the-fly item aggregation, refined fixing-by-dominance techniques, and a new divisibility bound that strengthens item fixing and symmetry breaking. These enhancements allow RECORD to preserve COMBO's near-linear-time behavior on most instances while achieving substantial speedups on more challenging cases, and computational experiments show that it consistently outperforms both COMBO and BOUKNAP on difficult benchmark sets, often by several orders of magnitude, establishing a new state-of-the-art solver for KP and BKP.

Authors: Renan Fernando Franco da Silva, Vinícius Loti de Lima, Rafael C. S. Schouery, Jean-François Côté, Manuel Iori

Cutting and packing problems are fundamental in manufacturing and logistics, as they aim to minimize waste and improve efficiency. The Cutting Stock Problem (CSP) concerns material cutting, whereas the Bin Packing Problem (BPP) concerns packing items into bins. Since the 1960s, these problems have been widely studied because of their industrial relevance and computational complexity. Over time, exact algorithms, often based on mixed-integer programming (MIP), have become able to solve increasingly large instances, often with hundreds of items, within minutes. In 2016, Delorme et al. showed that the algorithm BELOV, combined with a modern version of CPLEX, could solve all benchmark instances available at that time within ten minutes. Motivated by this progress, they introduced two new classes of instances, AI and ANI, which proved extremely challenging for all exact solvers and have guided research on CSP and BPP over the past decade. Despite significant subsequent advances, 13 out of 500 of these instances remain unsolved by state-of-the-art algorithms within a one-hour time limit. In this paper, we show that although AI and ANI instances are particularly hard for MIP-based methods, the BPP restricted to these classes is not strongly NP-hard. We present polynomial-time algorithms for the AI class and pseudopolynomial-time algorithms for the ANI class. Our best algorithms solve all benchmark instances from these classes orders of magnitude faster than previous approaches. They are also straightforward to adapt to the Skiving Stock Problem (SSP), which can be seen as a counterpart of the CSP. Additionally, they can be used as preprocessing routines in exact methods, as their runtime is independent of the instance class, although they are guaranteed to return an optimality status only for instances belonging to the class for which they were designed.

We consider the worst-case hardness of the gap version of the classic time-bounded Kolmogorov complexity problem—$Gap_pMK^tP[s_1,s_2]$—where the goal is to determine whether for a given string x, $K^t(x) ?s_1(n)$ or $K^{p(t)}(x) > s_2(n)$, where $K^t(x)$ denotes the t-bounded Kolmogorov complexity of x. As shown by Hirahara (STOC’18), if $Gap_pMK^tP[s_1,s_2] \notin prBPP$ for every polynomial p, then (under appropriate derandomization assumption) $Gap_pMK^tP$ is errorless average-case hard with respect to BPP heuristics. The notion of errorless average-case hardness, however, is seemingly insufficient for cryptographic applications where one needs to consider average-case hardness against attacks that simply may err with some probability (i.e., two-sided error hardness). In this work, we present several new consequences of the assumption that $Gap_pMK^tP[s_1,s_2]\notin P/poly$ for all polynomials p, for appropriate choices of $s_1$,$s_2$, and under appropriate (worst-case) derandomization assumptions. In particular, we show that this assumption implies: - The existence of an (inefficient-prover) zero-knowledge proof system for NP with a non-uniform simulator w.r.t. adversaries with a-priori bounded-length auxiliary-input. -  The existence of a hard disjoint NP pair, defined as a promise problem $(Y,N)$ where both $Y,N\in NP$; this provides a barrier towards showing that $Gap_pMK^tP$ is NP-complete. The above results are proven via first showing that the above assumption implies the existence of a so-called conditional PRG—roughly speaking, a cryptographic PRG where indistinguishability only needs to hold for some (potentially not efficiently sampleable) distribution over the seed to the PRG. (In fact, this notion of a PRG also almost directly implies average-case hardness of $Gap_pMK^tP$, and as such, this provides a modular explanation to Hirahara’s results.) Finally, we show that for the results on conditional PRGs and Zero-knowledge Proofs, unconditional results can be obtained (that is, without making any derandomization assumptions), if considering an appropriate version of $Gap_pMK^tP$ concerning randomized $K^t$.

In this paper we study the cryptographic complexity of non-trivial witness-indistinguishable ($WI$) arguments of knowledge. We establish that: - Assuming that $NP\not\subseteq P/poly,$ the existence of a constant-round computational $WI$ argument of knowledge for $NP$ implies that (infinitely-often) auxiliary-input one-way functions exist. - Assuming that $NP\not\subseteq P^{Sam}/poly,$ there is no black-box construction of a constant-round (unbounded-verifier) statistical $WI$ argument of knowledge from one-way permutations. Here, $Sam$ is the collision finder oracle of Haitner, Hoch, Reingold, and Segev [FOCS '07]. Moreover, we identify a natural class of knowledge extractors for which stronger versions of the above implications hold (e.g., even if the protocols have many rounds).

Though I’ve been prefacing my lecture blog posts with italicized disclaimers, I want to single this lecture blog out as being targeted a bit more broadly. Because, in a weird confluence, the topic of this week’s lecture coincides with the topic of an op-ed by Leif Weatherby and me that appears this morning in the New York Times: forecasting and simulation.

We can’t avoid prediction and simulation in a class about feedback systems. Our theories suggest that better predictions and forecasts lead to better plans of action. Additionally, we try to make sense of complex, interconnected systems by simulating their behavior, and simulations often reveal surprising “emergent” behavior of the whole, which wasn’t evident from the modeled behavior of the parts. We also tend to think that the subcomponents of complex, interconnected systems make sense of their surroundings by predicting what other components around them will do.

I was a bit slippery in that paragraph about what the difference is between simulation and prediction. That’s because I’m still not sure how to draw a boundary between the two concepts. The most common axis is opacity: everyone thinks there is a fundamental difference between a model that is “easy to describe” from first principles and one that is purely data-driven. We call the latter “black box” to mark our disdain. The “transparent box” systems might derive from physical laws, and we write down a set of equations that dictate how each step relates to the next. The black box systems might be derived by curve fitting, where we pick a function of convenience, untethered from causal explanation, to describe how inputs have historically mapped to outputs.

I’ll talk more about the opacity slider in later posts this week, but today, I want to ask about the purpose of simulation. That axis is more interesting to me. Simulations can be used in many different ways. You might use a simulation to better understand a system itself. Simulations of mechanical systems can give you a feel for their performance limits. You can use simulations to figure out why something went wrong, deriving causal explanations from plausible mechanisms. And, of course, you can use simulations to predict the future. You can use these simulation forecasts to make a plan of action. Or, in our Draft-Kings-addled culture, you might use them to gamble.

Leif and I talked about this murky simulation landscape in the world of public opinion polling. Specifically, we wrote about the absurdity of silicon sampling. For those unfamiliar with the term, silicon sampling is when you design a social science survey experiment and give the questions to LLMs rather than people. As absurd as this sounds, people are really pushing to do this. There’s a billion-dollar startup called Aaru that is based entirely on this silly idea. And one of their fake polls slipped its way into Axios last week, without Mike Allen realizing that the “poll” he was reporting on was a computer simulation (embarrassed, Axios later edited the story to reflect the phoniness).

But why do silicon samples have so much cachet with pollsters and social scientists? As Leif and I argue in our piece, it’s because polls already rely heavily on simulation methods. Because of remarkably high nonresponse bias, pollsters lean heavily on statistical modeling to tweak their numbers to align with reality. Polls that use multilevel regression and poststratification are already inputting a lot of simulated reality to “correct” their summarization of the data they collected. The number isn’t “percentage of yesses in my sample,” it’s “what I think the percentage of yesses is in the population given my sample and my beliefs about the population.”

Since polling already relies heavily on simulation, tossing out the expensive part of the process—you know, asking actual people questions—feels like a logical conclusion. The Nate Silverization of political coverage turned polling into prediction. In the media, the goal of polls stopped being about understanding what people think and became more about predicting the outcome of elections. If all you need to do is predict, you don’t really need pristine distillations of understanding. You can take your empirical facts and use them solely to predict outcomes. And if the goal is just prediction, you don’t need to bother asking people at all. In fact, you want more reliable data than the fickle behavior of people nagged by pollsters at the end of some modern transmission line. If your goal is only prediction, you’re probably better off not talking to people at all.

But is the purpose of polling prediction? It depends on who you ask, but I’d like to think that the answer is no. At pure face value, the topline numbers of an opinion poll are a summary of a survey. They reduce a list of ones and zeros into two numbers: a mean and a variance.

Now, using a bit more social-scientific reasoning, we might interpret this summarization as a measurement of what a group of people believes. With a rigid methodology, we can consider polling to be quantified opinion. It’s a bit odd to think that you can “objectively” measure opinion in the first place, but this has been a supposition of social science research for a long time.

Unfortunately, statistics has incredibly slippery semantics that lead people to conflate summarization with measurement and measurement with prediction. Is the percentage of “people who answered yes” a summarization of the data? Is it a measured quantity about the opinion of a broader population? Is it a prediction of how people will vote in November? Yes?

I’m interested in this conflation for both political and academic reasons. Leif and I think the polling industry is harmful to the public sphere. But setting those politics aside, I think that being upfront about the purpose of simulations and forecasts helps demystify their outputs. Indeed, this week I’ll describe how purpose dictates forecasts. Prediction of the future is difficult. But if you tell me how my predictions will be evaluated, prediction of the future is trivial. I’ll explain more about why in the next post.

Subscribe now

By Ben Recht

Alice and Bob are given $n$-bit integer pairs $(x,y)$ and $(a,b)$, respectively, and they must decide if $y=ax+b$. We prove that the randomised communication complexity of this Point–Line Incidence problem is $\Theta(\log n)$. This confirms a conjecture of Cheung, Hatami, Hosseini, and Shirley (CCC 2023) that the complexity is super-constant, and gives the first example of a communication problem with constant support-rank but super-constant randomised complexity.

Imagine that every week for twenty years, people message you asking you to comment on the latest wolf sighting, and every week you have to tell them: I haven’t seen a wolf, I haven’t heard a wolf, I believe wolves exist but I don’t yet see evidence of them anywhere near our town.

Then one evening, you hear a howl in the distance, and sure enough, on a hill overlooking the town is the clear silhouette of a large wolf. So you point to it — and all the same people laugh and accuse you of “crying wolf.”

Now you know how it’s been for me with cryptographically relevant quantum computing.

---

I’ve been writing about QC on this blog for a while, and have done hundreds of public lectures and interviews and podcasts on the subject. By now, I can almost always predict where a non-expert’s QC question is going from its first few words, and have a well-rehearsed answer ready to go the moment they stop talking. Yet sometimes I feel like it’s all for naught.

Only today did it occur to me that I should write about something more basic. Not quantum computing itself, but the habits of mind that seem to prevent some listeners from hearing whatever I or other researchers have to tell them about QC. The stuff that we’re wasting our breath if we don’t get past.

Which habits of mind am I talking about?

1. The Tyranny of Black and White. Hundreds of times, I’ve answered someone’s request to explain QC, only to have them nod impatiently, then interrupt as soon as they can with: “So basically, the take-home message is that quantum is coming, and it’ll change everything?” Someone else might respond to exactly the same words from me with: “So basically, you’re saying it’s all hype and I shouldn’t take any of it seriously?” As in my wolf allegory, the same person might even jump from one reaction to the other. Seeing this, I’ve become a fervent believer in horseshoe theory, in QC no less than in politics. Which sort of makes sense: if you think QCs are “the magic machines of the future that will revolutionize everything,” and then you learn that they’re not, why wouldn’t you jump to the opposite extreme and conclude you’ve been lied to and it’s all a scam?
   
2. The Unidimensional Hype-Meter. “So … [long, thoughtful pause] … you’re actually telling me that some of what I hear about QC is real … but some of it is hype? Or—yuk yuk, I bet no one ever told you this one before—it’s a superposition of real and hype?” OK, that’s better. But it’s still trying to project everything down onto a 1-dimensional subspace that loses almost all the information!
   
3. Words As Seasoning. I often get the sense that a listener is treating all the words of explanation—about amplitudes and interference, Shor versus Grover, physical versus logical qubits, etc.—as seasoning, filler, an annoying tic, a stalling tactic to put off answering the only questions that matter: “is Quantum real or not real? If it’s real, when is it coming? Which companies will own the Quantum space?” In reality, explanations are the entire substance of what I can offer. For my experience has consistently been that, if someone has no interest in learning what QC is, which classes of problems it helps for, etc., then even if I answer their simplistic questions like “which QC companies are good or bad?,” they won’t believe my answers anyway. Or they’ll believe my answers only until the next person comes along and tells them the opposite.
   
4. Black-Boxing. Sometimes these days, I’ll survey the spectacular recent progress in fault-tolerance, 2-qubit gate fidelities, programmable hundred-qubit systems, etc., only to be answered with a sneer: “What’s the biggest number that Shor’s algorithm has factored? Still 15 after all these years? Haha, apparently the emperor has no clothes!” I’ve commented that this is sort of like dismissing the Manhattan Project as hopelessly stalled in 1944, on the ground that so far it hasn’t produced even a tiny nuclear explosion. Or the Apollo program in 1967, on the ground that so far it hasn’t gotten any humans even 10% of the way to the moon. Or GPT in 2020, on the ground that so far it can’t even do elementary-school math. Yes, sometimes emperors are naked—but you can’t tell until you actually look at the emperor! Engage with the specifics of quantum error correction. If there’s a reason why you think it can’t work beyond a certain scale, say so. But don’t fixate on one external benchmark and ignore everything happening under the hood, if the experts are telling you that under the hood is where all the action now is, and your preferred benchmark is only relevant later.
   
5. Questions with Confused Premises. “When is Q-Day?” I confess that this question threw me for a loop the first few times I heard it, because I had no idea what “Q-Day” was. Apparently, it’s the single day when quantum computing becomes powerful enough to break all of cryptography? Or: “What differentiates quantum from binary?” “How will daily life be different once we all have quantum computers in our homes?” Try to minimize the number of presuppositions.
   
6. Anchoring on Specific Marketing Claims. “What do you make of D-Wave’s latest quantum annealing announcement?” “What about IonQ’s claim to recognize handwriting with a QC?” “What about Microsoft’s claim to have built a topological qubit?” These questions can be fine as part of a larger conversation. Again and again, though, someone who doesn’t know the basics will lead with them—with whichever specific, contentious thing they most recently read. Then the entire conversation gets stuck at a deep node within the concept tree, and it can’t progress until we backtrack about five levels.

---

Anyway—sorry for yet another post of venting and ranting. Maybe this will help:

The wise child asks, “what are the main classes of problems that are currently known to admit superpolynomial quantum speedups?” To this child, you can talk about quantum simulation and finding hidden structures in abelian and occasionally nonabelian groups, as well as Forrelation, glued trees, HHL, and DQI—explaining how the central challenge has been to find end-to-end speedups for non-oracular tasks.

The wicked child asks, “so can I buy a quantum computer right now to help me pick stocks and search for oil and turbocharge LLMs, or is this entire thing basically a fraud?” To this child you answer: “the quantum computing people who seek you as their audience are frauds.”

The simple child asks, “what is quantum computing?” You answer: “it’s a strange new way of harnessing nature to do computation, one that dramatically speeds up certain tasks, but doesn’t really help with others.”

And to the child who doesn’t know how to ask—well, to that child you don’t need to bring up quantum computing at all. That child is probably already fascinated to learn classical stuff.

By Scott

Authors: Jan Krajicek

A propositional proof system $P$ has the strong feasible disjunction property iff there is a constant $c \geq 1$ such that whenever $P$ admits a size $s$ proof of $\bigvee_i α_i$ with no two $α_i$ sharing an atom then one of $α_i$ has a $P$-proof of size $\le s^c$. It was proved by K. (2025) that no proof system strong enough admits this property assuming a computational complexity conjecture and a conjecture about proof complexity generators. Here we build on Ilango (2025) and Ren et al. (2025) and prove the same result under two purely computational complexity hypotheses: - there exists a language in class E that requires exponential size circuits even if they are allowed to query an NP oracle, - there exists a P/poly demi-bit in the sense of Rudich (1997).

Authors: Benedikt Pago

A notorious open question in circuit complexity is whether Boolean operations of arbitrary arity can efficiently be expressed using modular counting gates only. Håstad's celebrated switching lemma yields exponential lower bounds for the dual problem - realising modular arithmetic with Boolean gates - but, a similar lower bound for modular circuits computing the Boolean AND function has remained elusive for almost 30 years. We solve this problem for the restricted model of symmetric circuits: We consider MOD$_m$-circuits of arbitrary depth, and for an arbitrary modulus $m \in \mathbb{N}$, and obtain subexponential lower bounds for computing the $n$-ary Boolean AND function, under the assumption that the circuits are syntactically symmetric under all permutations of their $n$ input gates. This lower bound is matched precisely by a construction due to (Idziak, Kawałek, Krzaczkowski, LICS'22), leading to the surprising conclusion that the optimal symmetric circuit size is already achieved with depth $2$. Motivated by another construction from (LICS'22), which achieves smaller size at the cost of greater depth, we also prove tight size lower bounds for circuits with a more liberal notion of symmetry characterised by a nested block structure on the input variables.

Authors: Chinonso Onah, Kristel Michielsen

We formulate a global-position colored-permutation encoding for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Each of the $K$ vehicles selects a disjoint partial permutation, and the sum of these $K$ color layers forms a full $n\times n$ permutation matrix that assigns every customer to exactly one visit position. This representation uses $n^2K$ binary decision variables arranged as $K$ color layers over a common permutation structure, while vehicle capacities are enforced by weighted sums over the entries of each color class, requiring no explicit load register and hence no extra logical qubits beyond the routing variables. In contrast, many prior quantum encodings introduce an explicit capacity or load representation with additional qubits. Our construction is designed to exploit the Constraint-Enhanced QAOA framework together with its encoded-manifold analyses. Building on a requirements-based view of quantum utility in CVRP, we develop a routing optimization formulation that directly targets one of the main near-term bottlenecks, namely the additional logical-qubit cost of vehicle labels and explicit capacity constraints. Our proposal shows strong algorithmic performance in addition to qubit efficiency. On a standard benchmark suite, our end-to-end pipeline recovers the independently verified optima. The feasibility oracle may also be of independent interest as a reusable polynomial-time decoding and certification primitive for quantum and quantum-inspired routing pipelines.

Authors: Mark Braverman, Roi Livni, Yishay Mansour, Shay Moran, Kobbi Nissim

Modern machine learning systems, such as generative models and recommendation systems, often evolve through a cycle of deployment, user interaction, and periodic model updates. This differs from standard supervised learning frameworks, which focus on loss or regret minimization over a fixed sequence of prediction tasks. Motivated by this setting, we revisit the classical model of learning from equivalence queries, introduced by Angluin (1988). In this model, a learner repeatedly proposes hypotheses and, when a deployed hypothesis is inadequate, receives a counterexample. Under fully adversarial counterexample generation, however, the model can be overly pessimistic. In addition, most prior work assumes a \emph{full-information} setting, where the learner also observes the correct label of the counterexample, an assumption that is not always natural. We address these issues by restricting the environment to a broad class of less adversarial counterexample generators, which we call \emph{symmetric}. Informally, such generators choose counterexamples based only on the symmetric difference between the hypothesis and the target. This class captures natural mechanisms such as random counterexamples (Angluin and Dohrn, 2017; Bhatia, 2021; Chase, Freitag, and Reyzin, 2024), as well as generators that return the simplest counterexample according to a prescribed complexity measure. Within this framework, we study learning from equivalence queries under both full-information and bandit feedback. We obtain tight bounds on the number of learning rounds in both settings and highlight directions for future work. Our analysis combines a game-theoretic view of symmetric adversaries with adaptive weighting methods and minimax arguments.

Authors: Jarosław Błasiok, Paul Lou, Alon Rosen, Madhu Sudan

In the noisy $k$-XOR problem, one is given $y \in \mathbb{F}_2^M$ and must distinguish between $y$ uniform and $y = A x + e$, where $A$ is the adjacency matrix of a $k$-left-regular bipartite graph with $N$ variables and $M$ constraints, $x\in \mathbb{F}_2^N$ is random, and $e$ is noise with rate $η$. Lower bounds in restricted computational models such as Sum-of-Squares and low-degree polynomials are closely tied to the expansion of $A$, leading to conjectures that expansion implies hardness. We show that such conjectures are false by constructing an explicit family of graphs with near-optimal expansion for which noisy $k$-XOR is solvable in polynomial time. Our construction combines two powerful directions of work in pseudorandomness and coding theory that have not been previously put together. Specifically, our graphs are based on the lossless expanders of Guruswami, Umans and Vadhan (JACM 2009). Our key insight is that by an appropriate interpretation of the vertices of their graphs, the noisy XOR problem turns into the problem of decoding Reed-Muller codes from random errors. Then we build on a powerful body of work from the 2010s correcting from large amounts of random errors. Putting these together yields our construction. Concretely, we obtain explicit families for which noisy $k$-XOR is polynomial-time solvable at constant noise rate $η= 1/3$ for graphs with $M = 2^{O(\log^2 N)}$, $k = (\log N)^{O(1)}$, and $(N^{1-α}, 1-o(1))$-expansion. Under standard conjectures on Reed--Muller codes over the binary erasure channel, this extends to families with $M = N^{O(1)}$, $k=(\log N)^{O(1)}$, expansion $(N^{1-α}, 1-o(1))$ and polynomial-time algorithms at noise rate $η= N^{-c}$.

Authors: Mika Göös, Nathaniel Harms, Florian K. Richter, Anastasia Sofronova

Alice and Bob are given $n$-bit integer pairs $(x,y)$ and $(a,b)$, respectively, and they must decide if $y=ax+b$. We prove that the randomised communication complexity of this Point--Line Incidence problem is $Θ(\log n)$. This confirms a conjecture of Cheung, Hatami, Hosseini, and Shirley (CCC 2023) that the complexity is super-constant, and gives the first example of a communication problem with constant support-rank but super-constant randomised complexity.

Authors: Egor Fokin, Manolis Savva

Physics-based simulation involves trade-offs between performance and accuracy. In collision detection, one trade-off is the granularity of collider geometry. Primitive-based colliders such as bounding boxes are efficient, while using the original mesh is more accurate but often computationally expensive. Approximate Convex Decomposition (ACD) methods strive for a balance of efficiency and accuracy. Prior works can produce high-quality decompositions but require large numbers of convex parts and are sensitive to the orientation of the input mesh. We address these weaknesses with VisACD, a visibility-based, rotation-equivariant, and intersection-free ACD algorithm with GPU acceleration. Our approach produces high-quality decompositions with fewer convex parts, is not sensitive to shape orientation, and is more efficient than prior work.

Authors: Sandro M. Roch

A unique sink orientation (USO) is an orientation of the edges of a polytope in which every face contains a unique sink. For a product of simplices $Δ_{m-1} \times Δ_{n-1}$, Felsner, Gärtner and Tschirschnitz (2005) characterize USOs which are induced by linear functions as the USOs on a $(m \times n)$-grid that correspond to a two-colored arrangement of lines. We generalize some of their results to products $Δ^1 \times\cdots\times Δ^r$ of $r$ simplices, USOs on $r$-dimensional grids and $(r+1)$-signotopes.

Authors: Sariel Har-Peled

We provide a simple algorithm for computing a balanced separator for a set of segments that is $c$-packed, showing that the separator cuts only $O(c)$ segments. While the result was known before, arguably our proof is simpler.

Authors: Mattéo Couplet, Alexandre Chemin, David Bommes, Edward Chien

We present a method for generating orthogonal quadrilateral meshes subject to user-defined feature alignment and sizing constraints. The approach relies on computing integrable orthogonal frame fields, whose symmetries are implicitly represented using orthogonally decomposable (odeco) tensors. We extend the existing 2D odeco integrability formulation to the 3D setting, and define the useful energies in a finite element approach. Our frame fields are shear-free (orthogonal) by construction, and we provide terms to minimize area and/or stretch distortion. The optimization naturally creates and places singularities to achieve integrability, obviating the need for user placement or greedy iterative methods. We validate the method on both smooth surfaces and feature-rich CAD models. Compared to previous works on integrable frame fields, we offer better performance in the presence of mesh sizing constraints and achieve lower distortion metrics.

Authors: Yiming Gao, Yansong Feng, Honggang Hu, Yanbin Pan

We study the \emph{Subset Balancing} problem: given $\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{Z}^n$ and a coefficient set $C \subseteq \mathbb{Z}$, find a nonzero vector $\mathbf{c} \in C^n$ such that $\mathbf{c}\cdot\mathbf{x} = 0$. The standard meet-in-the-middle algorithm runs in time $\tilde{O}(|C|^{n/2})=\tilde{O}(2^{n\log |C|/2})$, and recent improvements (SODA~2022, Chen, Jin, Randolph, and Servedio; STOC~2026, Randolph and Węgrzycki) beyond this barrier apply mainly when $d$ is constant. We give a reduction from Subset Balancing with $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ to a single instance of $\mathrm{SVP}_{\infty}$ in dimension $n+1$, which yields a deterministic algorithm with running time $\tilde{O}((6\sqrt{2πe})^n) \approx \tilde{O}(2^{4.632n})$, and a randomized algorithm with running time $\tilde{O}(2^{2.443n})$ (here $\tilde{O}$ suppresses $\operatorname{poly}(n)$ factors). We also show that for sufficiently large $d$, Subset Balancing is solvable in polynomial time. More generally, we extend the box constraint $[-d,d]^n$ to an arbitrary centrally symmetric convex body $K \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ with a deterministic $\tilde{O}(2^{c_K n})$-time algorithm, where $c_K$ depends only on the shape of $K$. We further study the \emph{Generalized Subset Sum} problem of finding $\mathbf{c} \in C^n$ such that $\mathbf{c} \cdot \mathbf{x} = τ$. For $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$, we reduce the worst-case problem to a single instance of $\mathrm{CVP}_{\infty}$. Although no general single exponential time algorithm is known for exact $\mathrm{CVP}_{\infty}$, we show that in the average-case setting, for both $C = \{-d, \dots, d\}$ and $C = \{-d, \dots, d\} \setminus \{0\}$, the embedded instance satisfies a bounded-distance promise with high probability. This yields a deterministic algorithm running in time $\tilde{O}((18\sqrt{2πe})^n) \approx \tilde{O}(2^{6.217n})$.

Authors: Sarat Moka, Ava Vahedi

We present a new algorithm for the exact uniform sampling of proper \(k\)-colorings of a graph on \(n\) vertices with maximum degree~\(Δ\). The algorithm is based on partial rejection sampling (PRS) and introduces a soft relaxation of the proper coloring constraint that is progressively tightened until an exact sample is obtained. Unlike coupling from the past (CFTP), the method is inherently parallelizable. We propose a hybrid variant that decomposes the global sampling problem into independent subproblems of size \(O(\log n)\), each solved by any existing exact sampler. This decomposition acts as a {\em complexity reducer}: it replaces the input size~\(n\) with \(O(\log n)\) in the component solver's runtime, so that any improvement in direct methods automatically yields a stronger result. Using an existing CFTP method as the component solver, this improves upon the best known exact sampling runtime for \(k>3Δ\). Recursive application of the hybrid drives the runtime to \(O(L^{\log^* n}\cdot nΔ)\), where \(L\) is the number of relaxation levels. We conjecture that \(L\) is bounded independently of~\(n\), which would yield a linear-time parallelizable algorithm for general graphs. Our simulations strongly support this conjecture.

Authors: Huairui Chu, Ajaykrishnan E S, Daniel Lokshtanov, Anikait Mundhra, Thomas Schibler, Xiaoyang Xu, Jie Xue

In the Rectangle Stabbing problem, input is a set ${\cal R}$ of axis-parallel rectangles and a set ${\cal L}$ of axis parallel lines in the plane. The task is to find a minimum size set ${\cal L}^* \subseteq {\cal L}$ such that for every rectangle $R \in {\cal R}$ there is a line $\ell \in {\cal L}^*$ such that $\ell$ intersects $R$. Gaur et al. [Journal of Algorithms, 2002] gave a polynomial time $2$-approximation algorithm, while Dom et al. [WALCOM 2009] and Giannopolous et al. [EuroCG 2009] independently showed that, assuming FPT $\neq$ W[1], there is no algorithm with running time $f(k)(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ that determines whether there exists an optimal solution with at most $k$ lines. We give the first parameterized approximation algorithm for the problem with a ratio better than $2$. In particular we give an algorithm that given ${\cal R}$, ${\cal L}$, and an integer $k$ runs in time $k^{O(k)}(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ and either correctly concludes that there does not exist a solution with at most $k$ lines, or produces a solution with at most $\frac{7k}{4}$ lines. We complement our algorithm by showing that unless FPT $=$ W[1], the Rectangle Stabbing problem does not admit a $(\frac{5}{4}-ε)$-approximation algorithm running in $f(k)(|{\cal L}||{\cal R}|)^{O(1)}$ time for any function $f$ and $ε> 0$.

Authors: Sobyasachi Chatterjee, Sushmita Gupta, Saket Saurabh, Sanjay Seetharaman, Anannya Upasana

We study a natural generalization of the classical \textsc{Dominating Set} problem, called \textsc{Dominating Set with Quotas} (DSQ). In this problem, we are given a graph \( G \), an integer \( k \), and for each vertex \( v \in V(G) \), a lower quota \( \mathrm{lo}_v \) and an upper quota \( \mathrm{up}_v \). The goal is to determine whether there exists a set \( S \subseteq V(G) \) of size at most \( k \) such that for every vertex \( v \in V(G) \), the number of vertices in its closed neighborhood that belong to \( S \), i.e., \( |N[v] \cap S| \), lies within the range \( [\mathrm{lo}_v, \mathrm{up}_v] \). This richer model captures a variety of practical settings where both under- and over-coverage must be avoided -- such as in fault-tolerant infrastructure, load-balanced facility placement, or constrained communication networks. While DS is already known to be computationally hard, we show that the added expressiveness of per-vertex quotas in DSQ introduces additional algorithmic challenges. In particular, we prove that DSQ becomes \W[1]-hard even on structurally sparse graphs -- such as those with degeneracy 2, or excluding \( K_{3,3} \) as a subgraph -- despite these classes admitting FPT algorithms for DS. On the positive side, we show that DSQ is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by solution size and treewidth, and more generally, on nowhere dense graph classes. Furthermore, we design a subexponential-time algorithm for DSQ on apex-minor-free graphs using the bidimensionality framework. These results collectively offer a refined view of the algorithmic landscape of DSQ, revealing a sharp contrast with the classical DS problem and identifying the key structural properties that govern tractability.

Authors: Negin Golrezaei, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Suho Shin

In the contest design problem, there are $n$ strategic contestants, each of whom decides an effort level. A contest designer with a fixed budget must then design a mechanism that allocates a prize $p_i$ to the $i$-th rank based on the outcome, to incentivize contestants to exert higher costly efforts and induce high-quality outcomes. In this paper, we significantly deepen our understanding of optimal mechanisms under general settings by considering nonconvex objectives in contestants' qualities. Notably, our results accommodate the following objectives: (i) any convex combination of user welfare (motivated by recommender systems) and the average quality of contestants, and (ii) arbitrary posynomials over quality, both of which may neither be convex nor concave. In particular, these subsume classic measures such as social welfare, order statistics, and (inverse) S-shaped functions, which have received little or no attention in the contest literature to the best of our knowledge. Surprisingly, across all these regimes, we show that the optimal mechanism is highly structured: it allocates potentially higher prize to the first-ranked contestant, zero to the last-ranked one, and equal prizes to the all intermediate contestants, i.e., $p_1 \ge p_2 = \ldots = p_{n-1} \ge p_n = 0$. Thanks to the structural characterization, we obtain a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme given a value oracle. Our technical results rely on Schur-convexity of Bernstein basis polynomial-weighted functions, total positivity and variation diminishing property. En route to our results, we obtain a surprising reduction from a structured high-dimensional nonconvex optimization to a single-dimensional optimization by connecting the shape of the gradient sequences of the objective function to the number of transition points in optimum, which might be of independent interest.

Authors: Bernhard Haeupler, Yonggang Jiang, Thatchaphol Saranurak

We show that every directed graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges admits a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with $m^{1+o(1)}$ edges, called a DAG projection, that can either $(1+1/\text{polylog} (n))$-approximate distances between all pairs of vertices $(s,t)$ in $G$, or $n^{o(1)}$-approximate maximum flow between all pairs of vertex subsets $(S,T)$ in $G$. Previous similar results suffer a $Ω(\log n)$ approximation factor for distances [Assadi, Hoppenworth, Wein, STOC'25] [Filtser, SODA'26] and, for maximum flow, no prior result of this type is known. Our DAG projections admit $m^{1+o(1)}$-time constructions. Further, they admit almost-optimal parallel constructions, i.e., algorithms with $m^{1+o(1)}$ work and $m^{o(1)}$ depth, assuming the ones for approximate shortest path or maximum flow on DAGs, even when the input $G$ is not a DAG. DAG projections immediately transfer results on DAGs, usually simpler and more efficient, to directed graphs. As examples, we improve the state-of-the-art of $(1+ε)$-approximate distance preservers [Hoppenworth, Xu, Xu, SODA'25] and single-source minimum cut [Cheung, Lau, Leung, SICOMP'13], and obtain simpler construction of $(n^{1/3},ε)$-hop-set [Kogan, Parter, SODA'22] [Bernstein, Wein, SODA'23] and combinatorial max flow algorithms [Bernstein, Blikstad, Saranurak, Tu, FOCS'24] [Bernstein, Blikstad, Li, Saranurak, Tu, FOCS'25]. Finally, via DAG projections, we reduce major open problems on almost-optimal parallel algorithms for exact single-source shortest paths (SSSP) and maximum flow to easier settings: (1) From exact directed SSSP to exact undirected ones, (2) From exact directed SSSP to $(1+1/\text{polylog}(n))$-approximation on DAGs, and (3) From exact directed maximum flow to $n^{o(1)}$-approximation on DAGs.

Authors: Kemal Mutluergil, Deniz Elbek, Kamer Kaya, Erkay Savaş

Homomorphic encryption (HE) enables computation over encrypted data but incurs a substantial overhead. For sparse-matrix vector multiplication, the widely used Halevi and Shoup (2014) scheme has a cost linear in the number of occupied cyclic diagonals, which may be many due to the irregular nonzero pattern of the matrix. In this work, we study how to permute the rows and columns of a sparse matrix so that its nonzeros are packed into as few cyclic diagonals as possible. We formalise this as the two-dimensional diagonal packing problem (2DPP), introduce the two-dimensional circular bandsize metric, and give an integer programming formulation that yields optimal solutions for small instances. For large matrices, we propose practical ordering heuristics that combine graph-based initial orderings - based on bandwidth reduction, anti-bandwidth maximisation, and spectral analysis - and an iterative-improvement-based optimization phase employing 2OPT and 3OPT swaps. We also introduce a dense row/column elimination strategy and an HE-aware cost model that quantifies the benefits of isolating dense structures. Experiments on 175 sparse matrices from the SuiteSparse collection show that our ordering-optimisation variants can reduce the diagonal count by $5.5\times$ on average ($45.6\times$ for one instance). In addition, the dense row/column elimination approach can be useful for cases where the proposed permutation techniques are not sufficient; for instance, in one case, the additional elimination helped to reduce the encrypted multiplication cost by $23.7\times$ whereas without elimination, the improvement was only $1.9\times$.

Authors: Davi Castro-Silva, Jop Briët, Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Tom Gur

We provide algorithmic versions of the Polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa theorem of Gowers, Green, Manners, and Tao (Ann. of Math., 2025). In particular, we give a polynomial-time algorithm that, given a set $A \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ with doubling constant $K$, returns a subspace $V \subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ of size $|V| \leq |A|$ such that $A$ can be covered by $2K^C$ translates of $V$, for a universal constant $C>1$. We also provide efficient algorithms for several "equivalent" formulations of the Polynomial Freiman-Ruzsa theorem, such as the polynomial Gowers inverse theorem, the classification of approximate Freiman homomorphisms, and quadratic structure-vs-randomness decompositions. Our algorithmic framework is based on a new and optimal version of the Quadratic Goldreich-Levin algorithm, which we obtain using ideas from quantum learning theory. This framework fundamentally relies on a connection between quadratic Fourier analysis and symplectic geometry, first speculated by Green and Tao (Proc. of Edinb. Math. Soc., 2008) and which we make explicit in this paper.

Authors: Oded Lachish, Amit Levi, Ilan Newman, Felix Reidl

We consider graph property testing in $p$-degenerate graphs under the random neighbor oracle model (Czumaj and Sohler, FOCS 2019). In this framework, a tester explores a graph by sampling uniform neighbors of vertices, and a property is testable with one-sided error if its query complexity is independent of the graph size. It is known that one-sided error testable properties for minor-closed families are exactly those that can be defined by forbidden subgraphs of bounded size. However, the much broader class of $p$-degenerate graphs allows for high-degree ``hubs" that can structurally hide forbidden subgraphs from local exploration. In this work, we provide a complete structural characterization of all properties testable with one-sided error in $p$-degenerate graphs. We show that testability is fundamentally determined by the connectivity of the forbidden structures: a property is testable if and only if its violations cannot be fragmented across disjoint high-degree neighborhoods. Our results define the exact structural boundary for testability under these constraints, accounting for both the connectivity of individual forbidden subgraphs and the collective behavior of the properties they define.

Authors: Hiroki Shibata, Hideo Bannai

Repetitiveness measures quantify how much repetitive structure a string contains and serve as parameters for compressed representations and indexing data structures. We study the measure $χ$, defined as the size of the smallest suffixient set. Although $χ$ has been studied extensively, its reachability, whether every string $w$ admits a string representation of size $O(χ(w))$ words, has remained an important open problem. We answer this question affirmatively by presenting the first such representation scheme. Our construction is based on a new model, the substring equation system (SES), and we show that every string admits an SES of size $O(χ(w))$.

Authors: Oluwatobi Alafin, George B. Mertzios, Paul G. Spirakis

We present a comprehensive analysis of Round-Delayed Amnesiac Flooding (RDAF), a variant of Amnesiac Flooding that introduces round-based asynchrony through adversarial delays. We establish fundamental properties of RDAF, including termination characteristics for different graph types and decidability results under various adversarial models. Our key contributions include: (1) a formal model of RDAF incorporating round-based asynchrony, (2) a proof that flooding always terminates on acyclic graphs despite adversarial delays, (3) a construction showing non-termination is possible on any cyclic graph, (4) a demonstration that termination is undecidable with arbitrary computable adversaries, and (5) the introduction of Eventually Periodic Adversaries (EPA) under which termination becomes decidable. These results enhance our understanding of flooding in communication-delay settings and provide insights for designing robust distributed protocols.

Authors: Ilias Diakonikolas, Chao Gao, Daniel M. Kane, Ankit Pensia, Dong Xie

We study robust regression under a contamination model in which covariates are clean while the responses may be corrupted in an adaptive manner. Unlike the classical Huber's contamination model, where both covariates and responses may be contaminated and consistent estimation is impossible when the contamination proportion is a non-vanishing constant, it turns out that the clean-covariate setting admits strictly improved statistical guarantees. Specifically, we show that the additional information in the clean covariates can be carefully exploited to construct an estimator that achieves a better estimation rate than that attainable under Huber contamination. In contrast to the Huber model, this improved rate implies consistency even when the contamination is a constant. A matching minimax lower bound is established using Fano's inequality together with the construction of contamination processes that match $m> 2$ distributions simultaneously, extending the previous two-point lower bound argument in Huber's setting. Despite the improvement over the Huber model from an information-theoretic perspective, we provide formal evidence -- in the form of Statistical Query and Low-Degree Polynomial lower bounds -- that the problem exhibits strong information-computation gaps. Our results strongly suggest that the information-theoretic improvements cannot be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, revealing a fundamental gap between information-theoretic and computational limits in robust regression with clean covariates.

Authors: Sujoy Bhore, Hsien-Chih Chang, Jonathan Conroy, Arnold Filtser, Eunjin Oh, Nicole Wein, Da Wei Zheng

Given a weighted digraph $G$, a $(t,g,μ)$-DAG cover is a collection of $g$ dominating DAGs $D_1,\dots,D_g$ such that all distances are approximately preserved: for every pair $(u,v)$ of vertices, $\min_id_{D_i}(u,v)\le t\cdot d_{G}(u,v)$, and the total number of non-$G$ edges is bounded by $|(\cup_i D_i)\setminus G|\le μ$. Assadi, Hoppenworth, and Wein [STOC 25] and Filtser [SODA 26] studied DAG covers for general digraphs. This paper initiates the study of \emph{Steiner} DAG cover, where the DAGs are allowed to contain Steiner points. We obtain Steiner DAG covers on the important classes of planar digraphs and low-treewidth digraphs. Specifically, we show that any digraph with treewidth tw admits a $(1,2,\tilde{O}(n\cdot tw))$-Steiner DAG cover. For planar digraphs we provide a $(1+\varepsilon,2,\tilde{O}_\varepsilon(n))$-Steiner DAG cover. We also demonstrate a stark difference between Steiner and non-Steiner DAG covers. As a lower bound, we show that any non-Steiner DAG cover for graphs with treewidth $1$ with stretch $t<2$ and sub-quadratic number of extra edges requires $Ω(\log n)$ DAGs.

Authors: Nikhil Bansal, Milind Prabhu, Sahil Singla, Siddharth M. Sundaram

In the classic online graph balancing problem, edges arrive sequentially and must be oriented immediately upon arrival, to minimize the maximum in-degree. For adversarial arrivals, the natural greedy algorithm is $O(\log n)$-competitive, and this bound is the best possible for any algorithm, even with randomization. We study this problem in the i.i.d. model where a base graph $G$ is known in advance and each arrival is an independent uniformly random edge of $G$. This model generalizes the standard power-of-two choices setting, corresponding to $G = K_n$, where the greedy algorithm achieves an $O(\log\!\log n)$ guarantee. We ask whether a similar bound is possible for arbitrary base graphs. While the greedy algorithm is optimal for adversarial arrivals and also for i.i.d. arrivals from regular base graphs (such as $G = K_n$), we show that it can perform poorly in general: there exist mildly irregular graphs $G$ for which greedy is $\widetildeΩ(\log n)$-competitive under i.i.d. arrivals. In sharp contrast, our main result is an $O(\log\!\log n)$-competitive online algorithm for every base graph $G$; this is optimal up to constant factors, since an $Ω(\log\!\log n)$ lower bound already holds even for the complete graph $G = K_n$. The key new idea is a notion of log-skewness for graphs, which captures the irregular substructures in $G$ that force the offline optimum to be large. Moreover, we show that any base graph can be decomposed into ``skew-biregular'' pieces at only $O(\log\!\log n)$ scales of log-skewness, and use this to design a decomposition-based variant of greedy that is $O(\log\!\log n)$-competitive.

Authors: Marjan Homayouni-Sangari, Abolfazl Ramezanpour

We find that reinforcement exponentially reduces computation time of the quantum search problem from $\sqrt{D}$ to $\ln D$ in a $D$-dimensional system. Therefor, a reinforced quantum search is expected to exhibit an exponentially larger noise threshold compared to a standard search algorithm in a noisy environment. We use numerical simulations to characterize the level of noise tolerance via reinforcement in the presence of both coherent and incoherent noise, considering a system of $N$ qubits and a single $D$-level (qudit) system. Our results show that reinforcement significantly enhances the algorithm's success probability and improves the scaling of its computation time with system size. These findings indicate that reinforcement offers a promising strategy for error mitigation, especially when a precise noise model is unavailable.

Authors: Ravindran Kannan, Kijun Shin, David Woodruff

We study the Nearest Neighbor Search (NNS) problem in a high-dimensional setting where data lies in a low-dimensional subspace and is corrupted by Gaussian noise. Specifically, we consider a semi-random model in which $n$ points from an unknown $k$-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^d$ ($k \ll d$) are perturbed by zero-mean $d$-dimensional Gaussian noise with variance $σ^2$ per coordinate. Assuming the second-nearest neighbor is at least a factor $(1+\varepsilon)$ farther from the query than the nearest neighbor, and given only the noisy data, our goal is to recover the nearest neighbor in the uncorrupted data. We prove three results. First, for $σ\in O(1/k^{1/4})$, simply performing SVD denoises the data and provably recovers the correct nearest neighbor of the uncorrupted data. Second, for $σ\gg 1/k^{1/4}$, the nearest neighbor in the uncorrupted data is not even identifiable from the noisy data in general, giving a matching lower bound and showing the necessity of this threshold for NNS. Third, for $σ\gg 1/\sqrt{k}$, the noise magnitude $σ\sqrt d$ significantly exceeds inter-point distances in the unperturbed data, and the nearest neighbor in the noisy data generally differs from that in the uncorrupted data. Thus, the first and third results together imply that SVD can identify the correct nearest neighbor even in regimes where naive nearest neighbor search on the noisy data fails. Compared to \citep{abdullah2014spectral}, our result does not require $σ$ to be at least an inverse polynomial in the ambient dimension $d$. Our analysis uses perturbation bounds for singular spaces together with Gaussian concentration and spherical symmetry. We also provide empirical results on real datasets supporting our theory.

Authors: Kun He

The Sinkhorn--Knopp (SK) algorithm is a cornerstone method for matrix scaling and entropically regularized optimal transport (EOT). Despite its empirical efficiency, existing theoretical guarantees to achieve a target marginal accuracy $\varepsilon$ deteriorate severely in the presence of outliers, bottlenecked either by the global maximum regularized cost $η\|C\|_\infty$ (where $η$ is the regularization parameter and $C$ the cost matrix) or the matrix's minimum-to-maximum entry ratio $ν$. This creates a fundamental disconnect between theory and practice. In this paper, we resolve this discrepancy. For EOT, we introduce the novel concept of well-boundedness, a local bulk mass property that rigorously isolates the well-behaved portion of the data from extreme outliers. We prove that governed by this fundamental notion, SK recovers the target transport plan for a problem of dimension $n$ in $O(\log n - \log \varepsilon)$ iterations, completely independent of the regularized cost $η\|C\|_\infty$. Furthermore, we show that a virtually cost-free pre-scaling step eliminates the dimensional dependence entirely, accelerating convergence to a strictly dimension-free $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ iterations. Beyond EOT, we establish a sharp phase transition for general $(\boldsymbol{u},\boldsymbol{v})$-scaling governed by a critical matrix density threshold. We prove that when a matrix's density exceeds this threshold, the iteration complexity is strictly independent of $ν$. Conversely, when the density falls below this threshold, the dependence on $ν$ becomes unavoidable; in this sub-critical regime, we construct instances where SK requires $Ω(n/\varepsilon)$ iterations.

Authors: Stephen Arndt, Benjamin Moseley, Kirk Pruhs, Chaitanya Swamy, Michael Zlatin

We study algorithmic matroid intersection coloring. Given $k$ matroids on a common ground set $U$ of $n$ elements, the goal is to partition $U$ into the fewest number of color classes, where each color class is independent in all matroids. It is known that $2χ_{\max}$ colors suffice to color the intersection of two matroids, $(2k-1)χ_{\max}$ colors suffice for general $k$, where $χ_{\max}$ is the maximum chromatic number of the individual matroids. However, these results are non-constructive, leveraging techniques such as topological Hall's theorem and Sperner's Lemma. We provide the first polynomial-time algorithms to color two or more general matroids where the approximation ratio depends only on $k$ and, in particular, is independent of $n$. For two matroids, we constructively match the $2χ_{\max}$ existential bound, yielding a 2-approximation for the Matroid Intersection Coloring problem. For $k$ matroids we achieve a $(k^2-k)χ_{\max}$ coloring, which is the first $O(1)$-approximation for constant $k$. Our approach introduces a novel matroidal structure we call a \emph{flexible decomposition}. We use this to formally reduce general matroid intersection coloring to graph coloring while avoiding the limitations of partition reduction techniques, and without relying on non-constructive topological machinery. Furthermore, we give a \emph{fully polynomial randomized approximation scheme} (FPRAS) for coloring the intersection of two matroids when $χ_{\max}$ is large. This yields the first polynomial-time constructive algorithm for an asymptotic variant of Rota's Basis Conjecture. This constructivizes Montgomery and Sauermann's recent asymptotic breakthrough and generalizes it to arbitrary matroids.