Akiva Kadari, Pablo Soberon and the cascade conjecture The cascade conjecture is discussed in this post. I proposed the conjecture back in 1974, inspired by work by Meir Katchalski (though the name “Cascade Conjecture” only came into use over the … Continue reading →
Akiva Kadari, Pablo Soberon and the cascade conjecture

The cascade conjecture is discussed in this post. I proposed the conjecture back in 1974, inspired by work by Meir Katchalski (though the name “Cascade Conjecture” only came into use over the last decade or two).
Akiva Kadari, a master’s student of Micha Perles, proved the planar case in his M.Sc. thesis. Although the proof was ready in the early-to-mid 1980s, writing the thesis was delayed until 1990, when Micha was on sabbatical and I stepped in as a co-supervisor. (Akiva himself was present in the lecture.)

This is the conjecture

Recently. Pablo Soberón proved a remarkable weaker version of the conjecture using topological methods—we will devote a dedicated post to it soon. Very recently, Pablo also disproved the last open case of Grünbaum’s famous mass partition conjecture.
Yaacov Kupitz and Geometric graph theory

Yaacov Kupitz once decided to spend a year abroad and got in touch with the famous mathematician John Conway. Just a few weeks before taking off, Yaacov discovered he was going to a different John Conway—also famous, but in an entirely different field! Pivoting quickly, Yaacov instead spent a year in Aarhus, Denmark, where he wrote an influential monograph on geometric graphs (which later became his M.Sc. thesis). Vertices in geometric graphs are points in the plane, and edges are line segments (or sometimes pseudo-line segments) between them. It is a fascinating area, and we have written about it here before. János Pach took Micha Perles’s course on geometric graphs at Rutgers in 1989 and subsequently added the topic to his own research interests. In a previous post, we presented two of Micha’s proofs in geometric graph theory, both related to arthropods: his “proof by Lice” and his “proof for Caterpillars.”
A nice story: Micha was once invited to spend a sabbatical at Rutgers at the newly founded DIMACS. One evening, he received a phone call from Daniel Gorenstein, the founding director of DIMACS, who explained that they needed to lower their offer from $70,000 to $65,000. Micha was quite surprised and responded that when he had originally accepted the offer (also over the phone), he was sure it was $17,000!
Two Helly type problems from the 70s

I thought the proof would come from a certain extension of the Nerve Theorem, but it arrived from a different direction instead. Very recently, the conjecture was proved for
by Giuliamaria Menara in the paper A Helly-Type Theorem for two-component convex sets.

I presented this conjecture in a birthday party of another Micha—Micha Sharir. Shortly afterward, it was settled and since then further extended in various directions.
Meir Katchalski’s theorems about the dimensions of intersections of convex sets.



Meir Katchalski’s beautiful theorems about the dimensions of intersections of convex sets were proved as part of his master’s and doctoral work. He obtained results regarding fractional Helly theorems, common transversals, and various other directions. (In my own doctoral work, I settled a conjecture by Katchalski and Perles.) Meir is the son of Israel’s fourth president, the renowned biologist Ephraim Katzir. I also spoke a bit about Branko Grünbaum, Micha’s doctoral supervisor. In one of the pictures , you can see representatives of five academic generations starting with Branko.
Ido Shemer and neighborly polytopes

Ido Shemer was a Ph.D. student around the same time as Noga Alon, Yaacov Kupitz, and me. His thesis was on neighborly polytopes, and he invented the “sewing” method.
The Kupitz-Perles conjecture

We devoted two posts to this beautiful conjecture (here and here), and Rom Pinchasi talked about it in greater detail in his lecture. When Rom proved his remarkable
result, I used to ask him in a friendly way (or so I thought!), as a gesture of appreciation for his abilities: “What about
?” From Rom’s lecture, I learned that he felt uncomfortable about this and regarded it as a form of pressure. To quote Rom: “Gil log-log-logged me every time he saw me in the corridors of the Einstein Institute.”

Four slides from Rom’s lecture.
Ziva Deutsch non convexity and graph homomorphisms

Nonconvexity is a very interesting topic closely related to graph homomorphisms—a subject that was greatly advanced by Perles and his students, as well as by Jarik Nešetřil and his colleagues. Two decades ago, Jarik gave a lecture series in Jerusalem on graph homomorphisms. The shapes in the slide are taken from a 1970 paper by Kay and Guay (see the picture below).

Interesting examples of nonconvexity. You can see two interesting extensions of the Magen David symbol, as well as two “dancing rulers.”

Here are Mazi, my mother, and me with Micha and members of his family. The younger daughter in the picture came to the session along with Micha’s oldest daughter. Two of Micha’s grandchildren, Shlomi and Itai, also attended—turns out they participated in our Math + AI project!
Moshe Rosenfeld, Yosi Zaks, and Amos Altshuler

I also wanted to mention three contemporaries of Micha: Moshe, Yosi, and Amos. Yosi Zaks and Moshe Rosenfeld were both students of Grünbaum—I mentioned their work and their problems here, here, and here. Amos Altshuler is the same age as Micha, but was unofficially Micha’s doctoral student (officially, he was Furstenberg’s student). Amos’s Ph.D. thesis discussed high-dimensional analogs of Hamiltonian cycles, which he tried to find in the boundary complexes of stacked polytopes.
An anecdote: Ehud, Ziva, and Micha

Michael Kallay and Zeev Smilansky

Michael Kallay (an older academic brother) and Zeev Smilansky (a younger one) studied the decomposition of polytopes. (In Hebrew, Michael’s surname and mine have the exact same spelling.) I was enthusiastic about Zeev’s extensions of cyclic polytopes—though Zeev himself did not share my enthusiasm! Zeev eventually moved into biotech, winemaking, and writing prose and poetry, all while spending decades trying to find an elementary geometric proof and strengthenings for the unimodality of the $h$-vector of simple polytopes. (See this post.)
Kallay’s father was a mathematician who wrote an early Hebrew book on calculus. Zeev Smilansky’s father was the famous writer Izhar Smilansky (S. Izhar).
Micha’s early work on Gale’s transform

Micha Perles used the Gale transform to translate the geometric and combinatorial properties of a
-dimensional polytope into a lower-dimensional vector configuration in
. This made it possible to study, classify, enumerate and construct complex, higher-dimensional polytopes through lower-dimensional representation. One of the most famous applications was Perles constructions an 8-dimensional polytope with 12 vertices that cannot be realized with rational Cartesian coordinates. Gale transform record the affine dependencies among vertices, and many years ago I conjectured that the space of affine stresses could lead to a similar useful “transform”.
Enumeration of skeletons of polytopes

This is another beautiful theorem by Micha Perles and a beautiful subsequent theorem by Arnau Padrol.
Jamil Kasem’s thesis

Kasem’s thesis dealt with neighborly families of standard boxes which are described by packing of a complete graph with complete bipartite graphs.
Another anecdote

I cannot translate it to English. Since that telephone call Ehud refers to ChatGPT as “my daughter Chatgi.”

By Gil Kalai